On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:57:48AM +0100, Andreas Krey wrote: > With no per-stream window a single stalled stream would > block the circuit forever.
Wait, what? Can you define 'stalled' here? I think you are misunderstanding the current (and proposed) design. With no per-stream window, the circuit will round-robin between the streams that want to send a cell, just as it does now. The only difference in the proposed change is that it would stop ignoring streams who have sent their whole stream window but not yet heard a stream-level sendme back. In either case it would continue obeying the circuit sendme windows. > When a stream announces window to the other side I expect it > to be capable to accept that data somewhere, so even if the > stream windows currently overbook the circuit window that > data should drain into the local buffers and let the circuit > window reopen. It does. --Roger _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
