[email protected] writes: > I summed up the discussion plus what I had in mind with in 15 tickets > that I put on the track. > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needs_information&status=needs_review&status=needs_revision&status=new&status=reopened&component=Stegotorus&order=priority > > Zack is going to suppliment it with few more steg module concerns. By > that time we should have a fairly complete list. >
The code monkey inside me doesn't see any code-quality-related tickets in that URL. stegotorus boasts 12k LoC of C++ and some of that code was written in haste. Looking at this from a deployment point of view, I feel much more relaxed and easygoing with deploying programs written in a high-level language (like Flashproxy or pyobfsproxy) than with deploying an unaudited C++ program with many bad code moments. I think that a trac ticket with a bit of research on how painful would be to write a deployable <high-level language>-port of stegotorus would be a good idea. I know that Zack is also interested in exploring this avenue. _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
