On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:36 PM, SiNA Rabbani <[email protected]> wrote: > Are we also interested in translating this to other languages? Perhaps > we can get the Farsi done ASAP, since we now have a country obfsproxy > users coming to this page soon :)
Yes, I pointed george (asn) in the direction of my TorCheck repo (https://github.com/aagbsn/TorCheck) which outlines the sort of templating and i18 work that should make supporting BridgeDB's front end easier. --Aaron > > All the best, > SiNA > > Andrew Lewman: >> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:08:36 +0530 >> Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> In general, these look great. >> Some nitpicking items: >> >>> Here are the .htmls - >>> https://people.torproject.org/~gsathya/html/index.html >> >> 1. The majority of users aren't going to know which obfsproxy browser >> they're using. I understand the difference, but to make a decision, >> we should only ship one obfsTBB and assume everyone is using it as a >> target for this site. I'm guessing we just call the >> obfsproxy-flashproxy-tbb as obfsTBB and move forward with it. >> >> 2. The correct email address is [email protected] >> >> 3. I think we should scrap "normal bridges" and only promoted obfuscated >> bridges. In the bigger picture, "normal bridges" are already subject to >> DPI attack and blocked in many places in the world based on Tor's >> network signature alone. All bridges should be obfsproxy bridges. >> > > > -- > “Be the change you want to see in the world.” Gandhi > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
