On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > George Kadianakis: > > That said, what is the best way to update the Debian packages so that they > > contain the Python codebase? > > obfsproxy will be in Wheezy. So in any cases, if the binary package name > is going to stay the same, it would probably be better to have a version > number for the Python codebase higher than the previous implementation.
Or we just use an epoch. That's what they are for. > > Lunar, how did the Debian package creation go? Do you need any help? We > > should name the new packages 'obfsproxy'. > > The package is waiting in the NEW queue: > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/pyobfsproxy_0.0.2-1.html > > Do you plan to rename the Git repository, project page and all for the > Python codebase? If not, we can have the source package "pyobfsproxy" > create a "obfsproxy" binary package that would superseed the package > currently in Debian. It could only be done after the actual "obfsproxy" > is removed, though. > > Should I ask the ftpmasters to remove pyobfsproxy from the NEW queue > until we sort this out? Probably. If we want to re-use the source package name obfsproxy that's fine with me too. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `- http://www.debian.org/ _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
