On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:11:37PM -0400, Paul Syverson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:35:45PM +0000, adrelanos wrote: > > > I think that having a web server to handle Tor requests would defeat the > > > purpose of obfuscation because the server's IP address would be public and > > > censors could easily block any connections to it rendering it useless. > > > > It's not so easy if users host their own torified CGIproxies on their > > own servers. - Ok, how many users are technically able and willing to do > > that? > > We called this remote-proxy access in "Anonymous Connections and Onion > Routing" https://www.onion-router.net/Publications.html#JSAC-1998
Thanks for the link! > (Somebody should really put the early onion routing papers on anonbib, > almost none of them are there. Copious free time and all that I > guess.) (For some value of copious free time? :) ) _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
