On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Andrea Shepard <[email protected]> wrote: > There are plenty of archs where the virtual address space is larger than > any single object can be; lots and lots of old real-mode x86 compilers, > for example.
This is why I keep saying "(provided that the address space is flat)". Please, everyone who doesn't believe this really seriously was required by C89 -- go read the comp.std.c archives from 1997-1999! I'm not making this shit up. zw _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
