>> >> This has the side effect of promoting good onion upkeep. >> >> Which people might be loathe to do given the recent paper >> about deanon hidden services seeming to be relatively doable. >> At least until those issues are solved... >> >> > of the system. After 6 months (or so) the naming will stabilize and be >> > (mostly) consistent month-to-month, but how do we guarantee that a >> >> ...not if people are replacing their network address every month.
[perhaps to avoid some small deanon risk till then?] > This shouldn't be a problem if the service id (onion address) remains > the same across IP address changes. If the HS is stable then, as far as > I understand this system, it should maintain its name. Meant 'network address' refer to onion (the anon system net addr), not the realworld IP. >> One such obvious scheme that exists today is your host simply >> routing packets out its tunnel interfaces resident on respective >> Tor / I2P / Phantom IPv6 address space to some such services. >> >> Then anything, or set of things with unique addressing amongst >> if they want it... on top of the provided secure network addressing. _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
