On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:28 AM, George Kadianakis <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > I'm not sure what we should do. I think we should figure out how much > stuff we want to change at this time: > * Should we change nothing, stay still and wait for the "next gen > hs" paper that might never arrive? > > * Should we change a few things we care about (keysize, #9001 etc.) > and leave the rest for the "next gen hs" paper? > > * Or maybe we should start incrementally fixing everything we can and > think again when we read the "next gen hs" paper? > > * Or maybe something else?
My thought is that we should write the best hidden services designs and specifications that we currently can figure out how to write, figure out what we _don't_ know how to write in it, and then decide whether that merits delay or not. We should also try to guess how compatible/incompatible what we don't know how to do will be with what we *do* know how to do, and have that influence or decisions too. There could be a fine "next gen hs" design paper in the works, or there might not, but IMO indefinite delay is a bad idea. yrs, -- Nick _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
