Ximin Luo: > I assume people will be interested in creating Debian packages for > these too. I am wondering if we should adopt a naming convention like > tor-pt-sshproxy, tor-pt-flashproxy, tor-pt-obfsproxy etc - like how > mozilla extensions are all called xul-ext-*. (We could even start a > working group too.) > > ATM this would involve renaming obfsproxy, but I am about to package > flashproxy, and thinking about what to name the package.
I have heard people making the argument that obfsproxy, at least, was not specific to Tor and could perfectly be used with plain SSH. The prefix “tor-pt-” would not really be appropriate then. -- Lunar <lu...@torproject.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
