On 1/6/14 7:58 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Karsten Loesing <[email protected]> > wrote: >> [Re-sending, because my first attempt apparently got lost somewhere. >> Apologies if gets found and this is now a duplicate.] >> >> >> Hi devs, hi dir-spec.txt authors, >> >> when I reviewed the open proposals related to the directory protocol, I >> wondered how to integrate the proposed changes into dir-spec.txt. > > Oops; I missed this sentence, and should send a quick reminder: we > don't actually integrate proposals into the specs until after the code > is merged. (See proposal 001-process.txt) We learned this lesson from > the bad old days when our specifications were a mix of reality and > aspiration. > > I figure that you probably knew this, but just in case, I should > probably stop you from wasting time on merging unimplemented > proposals.
Sure. That's what I meant: *after* proposals are implemented. But thanks for pointing it out! All the best, Karsten > (To clarify: Nothing I've said in this email means we *shouldn't* > update dir-spec.txt for readability and maintainability.) > > peace, > _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
