Am 2014-06-29 08:57, schrieb Roger Dingledine: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:11:24PM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote: >> On 06/27/2014 09:44 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote: >>> What is the current state of the art on this, and if it is ready for >>> larger deployment want to buy about 50-100 of them. >> >> In my eyes, an access point that has a captive portal that teaches >> people about Tor and facilitates the download of Tor Browser etc is much >> better than transparent proxying. > > Right. Using a transparent torifying box as a client is dangerous, > because your Internet Explorer or other "normal" browser will probably > introduce surprising privacy problems compared to using Tor Browser. > Using your middlebox as a firewall to prevent non-Tor traffic from > transiting, i.e. to make sure you are using only Tor, is much safer but > also much less sexy. what would be an approach to build that? the accesspoint would need a list of current entry nodes, which is, all public relays, right? > > And the onionpi boxes don't have enough cpu to be a useful relay. > > They do have enough cpu to be useful bridges, but vanilla bridges aren't > very useful in the world these days: all the places where you need a > bridge you probably need one of the somewhat recent pluggable transports, > like obfs3, too. I wonder what the state is of easy-to-install images > that include modern pluggable transports and are maintained. Sounds like > another "volunteers needed" situation. :) > > --Roger >
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
