> 0. Does this proposal include adding these additional `X-*` fields to > the `@type bridge-server-descriptor`s as well? Or only to the > non-bridge server-descriptors?
This is for extrainfo descriptors, not server descriptors. Do bridges publish extrainfo descriptors? > 1. Why 5KB? > > Are we planning on allowing people to use Tor's consensus to pass > encrypted emails around? I understand the desire to enable relays to > be able to store *anything* in these fields, but this seems kind of > crazy. Couldn't we specify the maximum length per line to something > smaller? I also think that Ian's suggestion below to have an upper > bound on the number of individual keys is a good idea. > >> Should there be an upper bound for individual keys, values, or key/value >> pairs? This is something Virgil and I disagree about. I wanted a maximum line length and count, while he likes the net 5kb threshold. I'll let him explain his reasoning. Cheers! -Damian _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
