On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:33:34PM +0000, David Stainton wrote: > > Dear [email protected], > > Is DNSSEC is not evil? To me it seems like the 1984 of domain name systems... > Please take a good look at the political implications of DNSSEC. > I personally do not understand why this Tor Project spec includes mention of > DNSSEC: > https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt > > Can we use djb's DNSCurve instead of DNSSEC? > Perhaps I misunderstand the situation and the difference between DNSCurve and > DNSSEC. > Perhaps "ZOMG someone is wrong on the Internet!" will spark someone else's > interest in correcting me here > in this discussion. I personally think that people mentioning DNSSEC on tor > communications channels > must either have an agenda to help the US government gain more control of the > Internet... or they must be trolls. > But maybe I am totally wrong about this. I'd be interested in hearing a > correction if I am wrong... and > does this mean the DJB is also wrong? =-) > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNSCurve
Yeah, he is troll or/and NSA's agent :) He's already got the answer exactly the same as yours, from two people from tor-talk: 1. https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/219-expanded-dns.txt 2. DNSSEC is suck, not security technology. to [email protected], is it act of sabotage? Stop it or I will come for you! ;) _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
