Is the stormy code available anywhere yet? There seem to be no commits in the stormy repo (none in user/griffin/stormy.git either). A cursory web search didn't help either.
I'd love to review/test/contribute. On November 4, 2014 8:18:49 AM EST, George Kadianakis <[email protected]> wrote: >Griffin Boyce <[email protected]> writes: > >> Roger Dingledine wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >> >>>> - #8902 Rumors that hidden services have trouble scaling to 100 >>>> concurrent connections >> >> I've been curious about this ticket for a while, and happy to >> structure&run a follow-up test on a controlled server. Since the >> original problem was with an IRC server, it makes sense to set one up >> for the purposes of a test, and then set up a secondary machine for >> user' connections and an extra monitoring point. >> > >Yes, someone testing this theory would be awesome! > >I would be surprised if 100 connections is the _exact_ number where >HSes starts dying. However, I'd totally believe that there might be >issues causing HSes to get more unreliable after some load. We should >find these issues! > >> I suspect that there are other factors that might have influenced >> that report. Could it be an issue with one of the intermediary >> points? There certainly *seem* to be tons of people using the OFTC >> hidden service, but that could be perception (ie, still <100 >> concurrent users). >> >> <snip> >> >>> What sorts of hidden service examples are we missing from the world >>> that >>> we'd really like to see, and that would help everybody understand >the >>> value and flexibility of hidden services? >>> >>> Along these lines would be fleshing out the "hidden service >challenge" >>> idea I've been kicking around, where as a follow-up to the EFF relay >>> challenge, we challenge everybody to set up a novel hidden service. >We >>> would somehow need to make it so people didn't just stick their >current >>> website behind a hidden service -- or maybe that would be an >excellent >>> outcome? >> >> This could be fun. =) We could put out a blog post when Stormy >> reaches 1.0 about this too. >> > >Ah Stormy! > >I was a fan of the APAF project [0] and Stormy seems to be its >successor. I liked APAF because it would be the LAMP of Hidden >Services: it would make them easier to setup and configure. > >For this reason, I think Stormy fits very well with Roger's hopes of >"improving" the role of HSes in society. > >I'm excited to learn what you've been cooking in this front. > >Is there a document that describes what Stormy aims to do? It would be >great if such a design document existed even if Stormy is not at 1.0 >yet :) The document doesn't need to be big or detailed, but it would >be great if we could learn what Stormy is about. > >[0]: https://gitweb.torproject.org/apaf.git/blob/HEAD:/spec.txt > >_______________________________________________ >tor-dev mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
