-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23/03/15 15:26, Nusenu wrote: > Nusenu: >> I figured it might make sense to discuss this in a separate >> thread. > >>> And just in case you were wondering, if you ever have a feature >>> request for Onionoo, I'd be happy to discuss that. In >>> contrast to some of its clients, Onionoo itself is actively >>> maintained. > >> Actually I came to the conclusion that it would make sense to >> move the myfamily grouping to the backend since any other >> compass grouping is based on onionoo data and not on data >> "generated" by compass itself (grouping key). > >> The MyFamily grouping takes also a bit CPU time. So "computing" >> families once per generated details document make a lot more >> sense than recalculating them in every compass query again. > > Actually it is be a lot easier then I tough and does not require a > backend change at all, so you can ignore this one.
Okay, just in case you change your mind, let's talk more about integrating this into Onionoo. There's already the `family` parameter which I specifically added for Virgil's thing. Though for Compass (or its successor), you'd probably want a new field in details documents, not a parameter. Just let me know. All the best, Karsten -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVECt4AAoJEJD5dJfVqbCrKAUH+gK9pOThFkS70gidRV5PpmFJ ZmtlQzVBrq9iGdB/IxczKbTer5a3P81Moy8Y6S9K6fwAMasWVyfxOOq078iVnjly n1rhc1kaDRqlyo8oSAlzZDC5mW2MhOcloFJsMUOLryWkjPDGTUC8VpTMhKv1YWWs BPlhTeNBQjbtWYZbGbkVeCSbheT0amSJokfvOdAcxoIX++9WZRLG9L1IhDodo89i v8IU952Q7x7Qg8Cs67f7wQy1MjIqXavmu2zxMffUPVtaqXunG8zkDYdJYzNVfrOl O5gjv/oi96dawh8/f4FXJL9n0gRzNl5clV1LVTo2aUV9nAVvqTyuNuOfOQgmug0= =IlKR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
