> On 12 Sep 2015, at 17:26, isis <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > > However, for "double onion services" — or whatever we're calling the thing > that > is (historical) hidden services 2.0 — your point is a good one; I'm starting > to > realise more and more that defences for "double onion services"¹ are possibly > defences for bridges and vice versa. > > ... > > ¹ Sorry, but — after having to type that twice — that name sucks.
“double onion services” - I see what you mean. What about “dual onion services”? Or even “dual onion”? It’s shorter, and means the same thing. I’ll stop bikeshedding now. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP: 968F094B (ABFED1AC & A39A9058 expire 15 Sep 2015) teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F (From 1 Sep 2015)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
