Jesse V <[email protected]> writes: > David, > > I'm in the midst of reworking my OnioNS design around prop250 (and the > security > analysis therein) and as far as I can tell these changes make sense. I like > the > 00:00 -> 24:00 change as it's more intuitive as you said. I was at first very > concerned that you removed the majority requirement as that is the assumption > made during consensus generation, but I think your argument for the new > conflict > resolution make sense. I'm excited that the implementation is nearly complete > and I look forward to seeing it in Tor infrastructure! >
Hello Jesse, thanks for the feedback. Any opinions on whether we should keep the conflict lines or forget about them, based on David's email and my email? I just estimated that removing the conflict feature will kill about 400 lines of code, which is always nice :) Thanks :) _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
