> On Jan 16, 2016, at 4:52 AM, George Kadianakis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, I think I agree with this evaluation for now. Seems prop246 is more > complicated than we can handle, and we should probably postpone it, except if > someone can analyze it well soon.
I agree. There are too many open questions with proposal 246 to plan on implementing it in the same timeframe as we’re working on proposal 224. I suggest we change the proposal status to ‘Needs-Research’, and plan to gather all of these comments and make a real analysis of the tradeoffs at some later point. - special _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
