I noticed disk full too last week, I don't recall seeing an announcement about it but at least https://www.torproject.org/docs/running-a-mirror.html.en was updated to mention "Expect space requirements of up to 50 GB" so I knew what to do. It'd be great if future changes in expectation could be announced to the list, as arma did last time.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:13 PM, AskApache <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm good with 50GB, appreciate you guys keeping an eye on this. > > > On 5/27/2015 3:37 AM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: > > Hi, > > > On 26 May 2015, at 21:41, goll <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:47:14 +0100 > Sebastian Hahn <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings Sebastian, > > Unfortunately it happened again. > > Current usage of dist/torbrowser directory: > > 4.7G ./5.0a1 > 5.6G ./4.0.8 > 6.2G ./4.5a5 > 6.4G ./4.5.1 > 6.5G ./4.5 > 30G . > > Should the mirrors increase the dist volume size to more than 30G? > > It seems so, according to bug 15530[0]. That’s a lot of disk space for > everything that isn’t part of the mad rush whenever a new TB is released, > I’m not sure what good options are atm :( > > I think the recommendation will be 50GB for now. Even tho I have no idea > how many days/months/years that’ll be OK for… > > Cheers > Sebastian > > [0]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/15530 > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-mirrors mailing > [email protected]https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-mirrors > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-mirrors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-mirrors > >
_______________________________________________ tor-mirrors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-mirrors
