Do 2 and 3 matter? Are their concerns with running a relay and HS on the same tor instance if you aren't concerned with denonymizing your HS location?
-tom On 6 June 2018 at 16:13, George Kadianakis <[email protected]> wrote: > Gareth Llewellyn <[email protected]> writes: > >> Leading on from a discussion on Reddit's /r/onions; >> >> Given an operator who is "dual stacking" their website on both example.com >> and example.onion yet finds themselves with spare CPU/RAM/bandwidth and >> wants to operate a relay too what is the current community opinion of this? >> (given the caveats / conditions detailed below) >> >> On the inverse I operate a set of Exits [1] but these servers also have >> secondary services (ssh, grafana, httpd) that are exposed with onion >> services. >> >> There are recommendations for running multiple relays on the same host to >> maximize the CPU/bandwidth etc so I'd be interested if the community still >> opposes the running of HS' and Relays given the following conditions; >> >> 1. No anonymity concerns from downtime correlation (example.com == >> example.onion) >> 2. Relay daemon is a separate instance to HS daemon >> 3. Relay daemon and HS daemon bind to different IPs >> > > Hello Gareth, > > If you are aware of (1) and you have spare bandwidth/CPU, then I don't > see a problem running a relay alongside to your HS daemon. > _______________________________________________ > tor-onions mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-onions _______________________________________________ tor-onions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-onions
