Hey everyone!

Here are our meeting logs:
http://meetbot.debian.net/tor-meeting/2025/tor-meeting.2025-10-09-16.00.html

And our meeting pad:

Anti-censorship
--------------------------------

Next meeting: Thursday, October 16 16:00 UTC
Facilitator:onyinyang

^^^(See Facilitator Queue at tail)

Weekly meetings, every Thursday at 16:00 UTC, in #tor-meeting at OFTC
(channel is logged while meetings are in progress)

This week's Facilitator: meskio

== Goal of this meeting ==

Weekly check-in about the status of anti-censorship work at Tor.
Coordinate collaboration between people/teams on anti-censorship at the Tor 
Project and Tor community.


== Links to Useful documents ==
        * Our anti-censorship roadmap:
                * 
Roadmap:https://gitlab.torproject.org/groups/tpo/anti-censorship/-/boards
        * The anti-censorship team's wiki page:
                * 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/team/-/wikis/home
        * Past meeting notes can be found at:
                * https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/
        * Tickets that need reviews: from projects, we are working on:
                * All needs review tickets:
                        * 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/groups/tpo/anti-censorship/-/merge_requests?scope=all&utf8=%E2%9C%93&state=opened&assignee_id=None
                * Project 158 <-- meskio working on it
                        * 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/groups/tpo/anti-censorship/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=Project%20158


== Announcements ==


== Discussion ==

        * Reported blocking of www.cdn77.com by SNI, blocking of STUN servers 
in Russia, 2025-09-21
                * 
https://github.com/net4people/bbs/issues/422#issuecomment-3316062302
                * "I've noticed that stun protocol was blocked from mid-summer 
till today (it worked in June last time when I've used public stun to punch 
through NAT). Seems that only stun to public stun servers like 
stun.l.google.com, stun.bethesda.net were affected. Stun between webtunnel 
client and other webtunnel peer is not affected as can be seen in attached 
captures below. The only stun server that was accessible all that time was 
stun.rtc.yandex.net (of all the gists and lists of public stun servers I could 
find)."
                * "Had to change front though ... where <...> is another 
website using cdn77 I know. www.cdn77.com is blocked by SNI (session freezes 
after client hello), and www.phpmyadmin.net, though it doesn't cause hetzner to 
be blocked anymore, might cause stricter filtering or other side-effects."
                * We've been testing netlify in the alpha channel of Tor 
Browser, maybe it is time to use it in stable.
                * cdn77 domain fronts are already known to be blocked in China
                        * 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/team/-/issues/168
                * meskio has a list of cdn77 domain names.
                        * 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/team/-/issues/168#note_3268325
                * Could prioritize adding multiple builting snowflake bridge 
options
                        * 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/43842
                * onyinyang will make a forum post with workarounds
        * CDN77 blocking (new oct 09)
                * suspected blocking of phpmyadmin.net in Belarus: 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/censorship-analysis/-/issues/40067
                * Tor Browser 14.5.8 shipped on October 7 and 15.0 is expected 
to ship at the end of October
                        * Snowflake builtin bridge line now uses netlify: 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/merge_requests/1308
                        * Moat and Connect Assist should use netlify settings 
in stable now: 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/merge_requests/1539
                * Netlify has limits on total data transfer and number of 
requests
                * we plan to keep using netlify for moat
                * next week we'll have tests results on what domain names work 
for CDN77 and switch snowflake to use one of them
                * the post on the forum is life
                        *  
https://forum.torproject.org/t/snowflake-and-conjure-inaccessible-due-to-cnd77-blockage-try-this-workaround/20650
        * maintain go 1.22 in PT clients
                * 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/issues/41580#note_3270779
                * shelikhoo has been backporting security patches
                * we need to bring 1.22 back to the snowflake CI for the client
                * let's use 1.22 in lyrebird's CI
        * Decide whether to simplify webtunnel setting for sni imitation use 
case  
                * 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/lyrebird/-/merge_requests/135#note_3271738



== Actions ==

        * Remove webtunnel setuid script in 2 weeks.(decrease this by one every 
week)

== Interesting links ==

        * Mention of snowflake SNIs in the galaxy/platform/galaxy-qgw-service 
repo of MESA Git. The filenames include "E21" which is Ethiopia.
                * 
https://geedge-git.haruue.com/mesalab_git/galaxy/platform/galaxy-qgw-service.git/tree/benchmark/entity_dataset?h=dev
                E21-SNI-Top120W-20221020.txt
                        snowflake-broker.freehaven.net    903971    110
                        snowflake-broker.torproject.net    8667377    55
                        snowflake-broker.bamsoftware.com    1611029    49
                        snowflake.torproject.net    105990565    16
                        snowflake.freehaven.net    24545    6
                E21-SNI-Top200w.txt
                        snowflake-broker.bamsoftware.com    14468
                        snowflake-broker.torproject.net    50
                        snowflake.bamsoftware.com    8
                * 
https://geedge-git.haruue.com/mesalab_git/galaxy/platform/galaxy-qgw-service.git/tree/README.md?h=dev
                        * "Galaxy SQL, the unified query gateway, is built with 
Spring Boot 2.0 technology. It provides interactive SQL analysis and routine 
scheduling windows, supports streaming and batch jobs, and makes it easier to 
write and submit ETL programs and efficiently execute big data computations, 
aiming to make big data processing easier."
        * Mention of torproject.net domain names in 
tango/maat/test/tsgrule/TSG_OBJ_FQDN.E21. TSG is Tiangou Secure Gateway, E21 is 
Ethiopia, Maat is a rules matching engine.
                * 
https://geedge-git.haruue.com/mesalab_git/tango/maat.git/tree/test/tsgrule?h=v5.0.4
                592177551    151465    .snowflake-broker.torproject.net    0    
1    0    1    1683275236000000 0    key=592177551
                592561443    151465    .snowflake.torproject.net    0    1    0 
   1    1683275236000000 0    key=592561443
                592691531    151465    .forum.torproject.net    0    1    0    
1    1683275236000000 0    key=592691531
                594169529    151469    snowflake-broker.torproject.net    0    
3    0    1    1683276253000000 0    key=594169529
                594553421    151469    snowflake.torproject.net    0    3    0  
  1    1683276253000000 0    key=594553421
                594683509    151469    forum.torproject.net    0    3    0    1 
   1683276253000000 0    key=594683509
                * You can decode the microsecond timestamps like so:
                $ date -u --iso=sec --date=@1683275236
                2023-05-05T08:27:16+00:00
        * 
https://filter.watch/english/2025/10/02/irans-stealth-blackout-a-multi-stakeholder-analysis-of-the-june-2025-internet-shutdown/
                * 
https://filter.watch/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/10/Click-here-to-read-the-full-report.pdf
                * Discussion of Tor starting on PDF page 23

== Reading group ==

        * We will discuss "The Internet Coup" on October 23rd
                * 
https://interseclab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/The-Internet-Coup_September2025.pdf
                * Particularly relevant sections: "Blocking online privacy and 
circumvention tools" section of InterSecLab report on Geedge Networks, mentions 
Tor, Snowflake, WebTunnel
                * Notes: 
https://github.com/net4people/bbs/issues/519#issuecomment-3282101626

                * Questions to ask and goals to have:
                        * What aspects of the paper are questionable?
                        * Are there immediate actions we can take based on this 
work?
                        * Are there long-term actions we can take based on this 
work?
                        * Is there future work that we want to call out in 
hopes that others will pick it up?
== Updates ==
Name:
                This week:
                        - What you worked on this week.
                Next week:
                        - What you are planning to work on next week.
                Help with:
                        - Something you need help with.

cecylia (cohosh): 2025-10-09
        Last week:
            - updated snowflake builtin bridge line in Tor Browser 
(tor-browser-build#41574)
            - followed up with applications team about Moat and Connect Assist 
settings in the stable release
            - commented on increase of tickets in Belarus 
(censorship-analysis#40067)
            - researched snowflake enumeration attacks (snowflake#40396)
            - released and deployed version 0.9.7
        Next week:
            - research snowflake enumeration attacks (snowflake#40396)
            - watch and follow up on Moat and Connect Assist metrics with new 
netlify front
            - follow up on snowflake rendezvous failures (snowflake#40447)
            - take a look at potential snowflake orbot bug
                - https://github.com/guardianproject/orbot-android/issues/1183
        

dcf: 2025-10-09
        Last week:
        Next week:
                - open issue to have snowflake-client log whenever KCPInErrors 
is nonzero 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/-/issues/40262#note_2886018
                        - parent: 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/-/issues/40267
Help with:

meskio: 2024-10-09
    Last week:
        - SOTO preparation
        - grant planning
        - finding CDN77 domain fronts (team#168)
        - remove backend deadlock (rdsys!597)
        - investigate Telegram distributor silence (rdsys#286)
    Next week:
        - P146 report


Shelikhoo: 2024-10-09
    Last Week:
         - [Testing] Unreliable+unordered WebRTC data channel transport for 
Snowflake rev2 (cont.)( 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/-/merge_requests/315
 ) testing environment setup/research
         - Published Snowflake UDP mode test post: 
https://forum.torproject.org/t/invitation-to-test-snowflake-unreliable-transport-mode/20625
                    - vantage point maintaince
                    - deploy new vantage point version with fixed performance
         - [MR]Always use hostname in url for http host header in webtunnel 
transport. 
(https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/lyrebird/-/merge_requests/135#note_3271738)
    Next (working) Week/TODO:
        - Merge request reviews
        - [Deployment]Unreliable+unordered WebRTC data channel transport for 
Snowflake rev2 (cont.)( 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/-/merge_requests/315
 ) Building custom Tor Browser with patch applied
        - SOTO script
        - collect vantage point test result for fronting domains

 

onyinyang: 2025-10-02
        Last week(s):
                - Deployed updated telegram distributor distributing a 
proportion of webtunnel bridges to telegram users with new accounts 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/rdsys/-/issues/283
                - Managed some hiccups in the updated deployment
                - Wrote profiling patch for rdsys: kraken and email
                - Looked into conjure issue from China: fronts we are using 
appear to be blocked
                
Next week:
     - Troubleshoot conjure not connecting in China
     - Finish up debugging rdsys#129 and rdsys#249 hopefully
                - Continue looking into bridgestrap#47
                - Lox still seems to be filling up the disk on the rdsys-test 
server despite changes made to delete old entries, look into what's going wrong
      Switch back to some of these:
          As time allows:
               Blog post for conjure: 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/conjure/-/issues/46
              - review Tor browser Lox integration              
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/merge_requests/1300
              - add TTL cache to lox MR for duplicate responses:
                
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/lox/-/merge_requests/305

                - Work on outstanding milestone issues: 
                        - key rotation automation
                
                Later:
                pending decision on abandoning lox wasm in favour of some kind 
of FFI? 
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/43096):
                        - add pref to handle timing for pubkey checks in Tor 
browser 
                        - add trusted invitation logic to tor browser 
integration:
                        
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/42974
                - improve metrics collection/think about how to show Lox is 
working/valuable
                - sketch out Lox blog post/usage notes for forum
                
        (long term things were discussed at the meeting!): 
                - brainstorming grouping strategies for Lox buckets (of 
bridges) and gathering context on how types of bridges are distributed/use in 
practice
                        Question: What makes a bridge usable for a given user, 
and how can we encode that to best ensure we're getting the most appropriate 
resources to people?
                                1. Are there some obvious grouping strategies 
that we can already consider?
                                        e.g., by PT, by bandwidth (lower 
bandwidth bridges sacrificed to open-invitation buckets?), by locale (to be 
matched with a requesting user's geoip or something?)
                                2. Does it make sense to group 3 
bridges/bucket, so trusted users have access to 3 bridges (and untrusted users 
have access to 1)? More? Less?
                
theodorsm: 2025-06-12
                Last weeks:
                        - Applying for funding from NLnet to implement DTLS 1.3 
in Pion. Got through the first round.
                        - Writing paper for FOCI: continuation of master thesis 
about reducing distinguishability of DTLS in Snowflake by implementing 
covert-dtls, further analysis of collected browser fingerprint and stability 
test of covert-dtls in snowflake proxies. Draft: https://theodorsm.net/FOCI25
                        - Key takeaways: 
                                * covert-dtls is stable when mimicking DTLS 1.2 
handshakes, while the randomization approach— though more resistant to 
fingerprinting — tends to be less stable. 
                                * Chrome webextensions are more unstable than 
standalone proxies
                                * covert-dtls should be integrated in Snowflake 
proxies as they produce the ClientHello messages during the DTLS handshake.
                                * Chrome randomizes the order of extension list.
                                * Firefox uses DTLS 1.3 by default in WebRTC.
                                * A prompt adoption of DTLS 1.3 in both 
Snowflake and our fingerprint-resistant library is needed to keep up with 
browsers
                                * The evolution of browsers’ fingerprints had 
no noticeable effect on Snowflake’s number of daily users over the last year.
                                * Even with a sharp drop in the amount of 
proxies, it does not seem to affect the number of Snowflake users. 
                                * Browser extensions make Snowflake resistant 
to ClientHello fingerprinting.
                                * Standalone proxies can serve more Snowflake 
clients per volunteer than webextensions.
                                * We need metrics on which types of proxies are 
actually being matched and successfully used by clients. 
                Next weeks:
                        - Getting paper camera ready.
                        - Fix merge conflicts in MR 
(https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/-/merge_requests/448).
                Help with:
                        - Should we do user testing of covert-dtls?
                        
                        

Facilitator Queue:
        onyinyang shelikhoo meskio 
1. First available staff in the Facilitator Queue will be the facilitator for 
the meeting
2. After facilitating the meeting, the facilitator will be moved to the tail of 
the queue

-- 
meskio | https://meskio.net/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 My contact info: https://meskio.net/crypto.txt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nos vamos a Croatan.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

_______________________________________________
tor-project mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to