On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Steve Snyder <[email protected]> wrote: > I've got 2 bridges, with 1 IP address in each of 2 servers in the same > geographical area. The IP addresses are not consecutive. > > Both servers have the same hardware and software configurations. Both were > established in mid-January and (excepting a few brief periods of down time) > have been running since then. > > So why then in March did one server handle 200GB of traffic while the other > handled only 2GB? (Yes, a x100 difference.)
Sounds like one bridge ended up in the https or email pool (meaning we give the bridge address out via bridges.torproject.org or [email protected]), while the other ended up in a more private pool. > Also: is there something I can do to make my under-utilized bridge more > attractive to the Bridge Authorities? You could set it up as a relay instead? -- Runa A. Sandvik _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
