I should point out that the complaint wasn't sent to me directly, but somebody I know saw it on a usenet group and forwarded it, asking whether the Tor community was aware of it.
So as Roger points out, it's not a "routine" complaint, and in fact the complainant appears to know about and understand Tor. The complaint is in fact against Google so I think ignoring it would be the right course of action in this case as I don't want to be caught up in some anti-Google argument, regardless of what the detail of the issues are. Jonathan On 25 February 2013 10:52, Roger Dingledine <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:15:01AM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote: > > I'd explain what Tor, why it is > > important to have Tor around and how the complainer could block traffic > > from Tor exit nodes if really needed. > > In this particular case, I assume the complainer is "some dude upset > about what's getting posted via google groups". So the usual answer > (https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq-abuse#Bans) doesn't apply to him, > since he can't make any decisions on behalf of Google. > > I can see how he'd be frustrated, and how he'd resort to mailing Tor > exit relay operators one-by-one in hopes of solving his problem. > > But I can also see how it won't solve his problem. > > --Roger > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > >
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
