windows
2013/8/13 <[email protected]> > Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Planningon running bridge with bw limitation - config > help (Kostas Jakeliunas) > 2. Re: Raspberry Pi Relay Node Performance and future Plans on > Documentation and more ([email protected]) > 3. Re: Raspberry Pi Relay Node Performance and future Plans on > Documentation and more (Roman Mamedov) > 4. Is it safe to run an exit node from a VPS provider? > (Sindhudweep Sarkar) > 5. Re: Raspberry Pi Relay Node Performance and future Plans on > Documentation and more (Kostas Jakeliunas) > 6. Re: Is it safe to run an exit node from a VPS provider? > (Moritz Bartl) > 7. Re: Is it safe to run an exit node from a VPS provider? > (Steve Snyder) > 8. Question about TOR bandwidth management ([email protected]) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:20:25 +0300 > From: Kostas Jakeliunas <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Planningon running bridge with bw limitation > - config help > Message-ID: > <CAN0KoyhUfWa+W_T=x= > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Moritz Bartl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 13.08.2013 08:02, Kali Tor wrote: > > > I am actually in double minds about using obsproxy. Is there a demand > > for it? > > > > Yes! Please do set up obfsproxy. > > > Since obfsproxy bridges are usually really low traffic, I think the > combination of an obfsproxy bridge and raspberrypi makes quite a bit of > sense (that's what I'm running in any case, no problems so far (I also had > to compile Tor for armv6 from source)) :) > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130813/975ded58/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:02:35 +0000 > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Raspberry Pi Relay Node Performance and > future Plans on Documentation and more > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Hello all, > > > For any Raspberry Pi Tor node operators breathlessly following this > > thread :P I succeeded in building 0.2.4.16-rc on the Pi. We will see > > how it performs now vs the circuit creation storms. > > me too on the pi with kernel 3.6.11, using this source: > https://www.torproject.org/dist/tor-0.2.4.16-rc.tar.gz > it took 32 minutes to configure and compile (make && make install). > > > This is not a simple Debian-type binary package install, as the > > packages present in the Tor Project experimental repos are built for > > *Debian* wheezy - that is, ARMv7 - and not *Raspbian* which was built > > to support the ARMv6 CPU on the Pi. > > I'm wondering, is there any other method for running a tor > bridge/relay on > the raspberry pi, other than downloading the source and compiling it > yourself? > > Is it possible for the Tor project to make an extra option on the page > https://www.torproject.org/download/download-unix.html.en > with instructions for people to run a bridge/relay on the Pi? I think > it > will help people not to spend time on installing the experimental > wheezy > package for the ARMv7 architecture. > > Tor_Bridge > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:58:12 +0600 > From: Roman Mamedov <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Raspberry Pi Relay Node Performance and > future Plans on Documentation and more > Message-ID: <20130813185812.11d05c5b@natsu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:02:35 +0000 > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm wondering, is there any other method for running a tor > > bridge/relay on > > the raspberry pi, other than downloading the source and compiling it > > yourself? > > Raspbian has it in the repositories[1]. > > apt-get install tor > > Done. No need to build anything from the source. > > [1] http://archive.raspbian.org/raspbian/pool/main/t/tor/ > > -- > With respect, > Roman > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 198 bytes > Desc: not available > URL: < > http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130813/b950ce6a/attachment-0001.sig > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:04:10 -0400 > From: Sindhudweep Sarkar <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [tor-relays] Is it safe to run an exit node from a VPS > provider? > Message-ID: > < > cajxbjy3rlqdhgrk+dsrzff_q0tjer2-bgsvbj4vxmbdibco...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > Over the past month I've been running a tor exit relay in a spare VPS > machine that I am not using. > > It occurs to me know that this was probably a very poor idea, as I can't > control the physical access to the machine or encrypt private key. > > In the good bad ISPs > page<https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs>, > I see that some cloud providers are listed (aws, etc). This implies that > such a practice is okay, but If linode or a malicious party wanted to read > the contents of /var/lib/tor/keys I don't think they'd have any difficulty > whatsoever. How do folks secure their relay's keys on a vps environment? Or > should I shutdown this relay and run a relay only when I am sure the keys > are secured? > > > -JB > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130813/4f5abddb/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:04:42 +0300 > From: Kostas Jakeliunas <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Raspberry Pi Relay Node Performance and > future Plans on Documentation and more > Message-ID: > < > can0koyjlo9tym6qod1ykfzg_wplqy8cf+ru8rhofdcrcll6...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Roman Mamedov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:02:35 +0000 > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm wondering, is there any other method for running a tor > > > bridge/relay on > > > the raspberry pi, other than downloading the source and compiling it > > > yourself? > > > > Raspbian has it in the repositories[1]. > > > > apt-get install tor > > > > Done. No need to build anything from the source. > > > > You need Tor 0.2.4.* to run an obfsproxy bridge, which I wanted to do. > Wheezy repo only has 0.2.3.*; 0.2.4.* is only in the experimental Debian > distro repo [1], afaik. > > [1]: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/tor > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130813/32d6b123/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:32:02 +0200 > From: Moritz Bartl <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Is it safe to run an exit node from a VPS > provider? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 13.08.2013 15:04, Sindhudweep Sarkar wrote: > > Over the past month I've been running a tor exit relay in a spare VPS > > machine that I am not using. > > It occurs to me know that this was probably a very poor idea, as I can't > > control the physical access to the machine or encrypt private key. > > This is a very valid question. So far, we have weighted in favor of > "more exit capacity". If you require all exits to be on dedicated > machines, you lose a lot of diversity and thus, potentially, anonymity. > > Of course, you should prefer dedicated machines over virtual machines, > and own hardened hardware over off-the-shelf servers. We're not yet in a > (well-funded?) state where we can expect everyone to do this. > > -- > Moritz Bartl > https://www.torservers.net/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:58:34 -0400 > From: Steve Snyder <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Is it safe to run an exit node from a VPS > provider? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > On 08/13/2013 09:04 AM, Sindhudweep Sarkar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Over the past month I've been running a tor exit relay in a spare VPS > > machine that I am not using. > > > > It occurs to me know that this was probably a very poor idea, as I can't > > control the physical access to the machine or encrypt private key. > > Running an exit node in a VM is better than not running an exit node at > all. > > That said, not all virtualization is created equally. An OpenVZ > container (which is really not virtualization at all) leaves all your > files being just files on the host disk. > > Anyone on the host console can just do a "locate fingerprint" to see > those files in all containers and can list the processes running to see > your relay. > > At least with Xen/KVM/VMware you're running on your own virtual disk, > and are running all processes in a self-contained environment. The > traffic can still be sniffed by the host, of course, but you get more > privacy than you would in an OpenVZ container. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:46:08 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [tor-relays] Question about TOR bandwidth management > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" > > > Hello, > > Is it possible to configure a TOR node to have different bandwidth > limits at different times of day and on different days of the week? > > Thank you. > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130813/9d0b2a45/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > ------------------------------ > > End of tor-relays Digest, Vol 31, Issue 23 > ****************************************** >
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
