On 09/26/2013 03:11 PM, [email protected] wrote: > If my relay is in a datacenter with a fast link but constrained by a > in+out<100GByte monthly limit, is it more helpful to provide: > > * a slow relay that is usually available, e.g. 30KByte/sec available > about two-thirds of the time, or: > > * a fast relay that hibernates a lot, e.g. 1MByte/sec but only available > 1/50th of the time? > > Secondly, is it more helpful to be: > > * available every day for a fraction of that day, or: > > * available continuously for some consecutive days then hibernated for > the rest of the month? > > Thanks for any advice. (I've read differing opinions on these questions > written at different times, but haven't found a clear consensus.)
I don't think there is clear consensus. I would say make it available for a consecutive timespan, and set the speed limit to something not lower than 1 MB/s. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1854 -- Moritz Bartl https://www.torservers.net/ _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
