On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Patrick ZAJDA <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 15/01/2014 15:20, Runa A. Sandvik a écrit : >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Patrick ZAJDA <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> The second point is: I looked at the configuration, and noticed >>> bridge is set to 1. I though it made the tor relay private, do I >>> have miss-understood something? >> >> From https://www.torproject.org/docs/bridges: Bridge relays (or >> "bridges" for short) are Tor relays that aren't listed in the main >> Tor directory (as opposed to relays). Since there is no complete >> public list of them, even if an ISP is filtering connections to all >> the known Tor relays, they probably won't be able to block all the >> bridges. >> >> The difference between a Tor Cloud "obfsproxy bridge" and a >> "private bridge" is whether or not the bridge reports its address >> (IP address and port) to the Tor Project. If it does, the address >> will automatically be distributed to users who need it (through the >> help desk, bridges.torproject.org, etc). If it does not, it's up to >> you to distribute the address. >> > OK, so to be sure I understand: with an obfsproxy one, relay address > and port are listed but not in atlas.torproject.org?
Yes, that's correct. The address will be distributed to users automatically. Thanks for running a bridge! -- Runa A. Sandvik _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
