Please! I am not participate in this forum anymore! Any e mail that coming after this will be reported to Uk intelligence police (M15) Be aware pls with all posts or e mails here ! Have a nice weekend to all
> On 12 Jan 2014, at 20:51, I <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is Crissic I was referring to. > I've been caught by several similarly. > But I can say that a couple have quietly let it go on after I put some > argument taken from Jacob, Roger, and others of the real legal status of > nodes and Tor's real value. Some say Tor's good but the business rejects it > from its model. > > If we all keep stating the facts each time individually we must build the > collective impression that people using their own money for privacy and > against tyranny (Ayatollah/NSA same same) are reliable and a not real problem > and to be accomodated. > > CPU use level is the one I can't control. That may effect the other slices > of server but getting them on Tor's side might bring some tolerance. I asked > them to limit the resources to my VPS which gained some ground and an offer > of further help. > > Note the second anecdote wherein the VPS business went to the trouble of > downloading and installing Tor when I couldn't. > > I feel Tor is getting to a critical mass not to far away. Angela Merkel > might be looking at using it. > > Robert > > Same thing here. > I had a server from day one with them and was told "Sorry you've been with us > from the start. > But after careful consideration, Crissic Solutions LLC has decided to ban the > usage of TOR on the Crissic network." > > > One about three relays paid for a year in advance. > > “Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite “We DO > Allow Tor Relays" being in their current AUP. > [snip] > > I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation. It is Crissic > Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy. > > When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different > reasons, primarily network related." My take is that they didn't like their > users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for. > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
