It is firewalled. I should have said "connection attempts" in my first
email.


On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Tora Tora Tora <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 02/28/2014 11:14 AM, Greg W wrote:
>
>> Are you suggesting that the IP's making the connections are potentially
>> exit nodes (they're not, I've checked) or that abuse email volume in
>> general should be lowered regardless of the nature? Just trying to
>> understand your sentiment here :)
>>
>
> Why not firewall port 9050? If you need it for your own purposes, you can
> tunnel into your server. What's the point of allowing non-local connections
> on your Sock port?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Reply via email to