I believe that blog post, which I have also seen, is irrelevant (at least in my case).
1) Its graphs never show consensus weight dropping, only the throughput 2) My guard percentage has not gone up from 0 (presumably because I'm an exit node, not a standard relay) Also, what units are you measuring weight in? Is that %e-4, or %e-5 or similar? On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:53 AM, s7r <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/15/2014 11:24 AM, Bill Winslow wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > > https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/5B06042B4911171026059FB694215B97D10E47E8 > > > > I've been running an exit node for a few days now, and around 8 > > hours ago my consensus weight and exit probability dropped to > > essentially zero, after dropping substantially several hours > > previously. > > > > Why is that? Nothing in my logs suggests anything unusual -- but > > then again, I'm very new to this and thus wouldn't know where else > > to look or what to think about this. > > > > http://pastebin.com/mfkbPK9L > > > > Thanks for your time. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing > > list [email protected] > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > > One of my relays also had the consensus weight of 620 and today I > checked atlas it decreased to just 20, and nothing unusual in the > logs. Its uptime is the same like yours, few days (9 to be exact). > > I guess this is normal and it will grow to normal. The lifecycle of a > new relay blog posts explains it, in a way. > > Just give some more time to run and it should be OK. I saw your > advertised bandwidth is 512KB/s - that is reasonable, but the higher > you can give to your relay, the better and the bigger consensus weight > it will have. > > - -- > s7r > PGP Fingerprint: 7C36 9232 5ABD FB0B 3021 03F1 837F A52C 8126 5B11 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT7ea4AAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRzbIH/j99k3NaUG/VQgQXaEvRhF3R > 2vzV55t6M56KnL/DUr6ESbF9jHMZnpchAR2w5zIfmtJkw34Se2mxrjGXWJqnue/8 > fOH8JVSh/7cqmyoQAVjhTBBtrk5Nbkqz7QDAQYER+7KfAgBiMfocmeR1E++t5C9N > O+V5w/yM4deOh21z9bbMRgAEaAUPHAa2gSsHTNMtPCZxOWLN51o/cAj4ppjwsiNn > d/gphWJOE1AwFrQr4foaIdPBmrUiYQq7DXToMtGSCvks8j6mpzrtk/mcXCn89aFh > dKrprPTPl2/kyu7Rn6CfdpFRzZs2kJAGKbeZFrHi658oncfVhGCSEazj4h6vR3M= > =FeK0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
