-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> My OpenBSD node is currently on 0.2.5.10. > > Which is from the -current ports tree. On -stable it's > tor-0.2.4.23 but I doubt that you want to run your relay on > -current.
Huh? I compiled it from non-port source because the port at the time was old. For my first manual compilation, I think I was on 0.2.4.23. I'm now on 0.2.5.10 which, if I'm not mistaken, is the most recent stable Tor release. This was also compiled from downloaded, non-port source. My base and ports are on -stable, not -current. > You're wrong because you're mistaking port and package > (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html). No, I know the difference. However, the ports are compiled into the packages, no? Are the two not maintained together? I was focusing on the port because it's a little "upstream" of the package. Also, the port includes the necessary system changes like adding a daemon user, so aside from the pretty minimal compilation time, it's no different from a package install. > Have you only even tried to mail the maintener? That was going to come after reading some docs on port development and writing a patch or two. I don't like establishing contact until I have something worthwhile to offer. > You mean activating something which is activated by default since > 3.8 which has been released in Nov. 2005? You got me on this one. The below line in /etc/sysctl.conf confused me: #vm.swapencrypt.enable=0 # 0=Do not encrypt pages that go to swap In hindsight, it's pretty obvious. There's no need to be so aggressive, by the way. I like the generally friendly tone here. Libertas On 11/05/2014 04:40 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:17:29 -0500, Libertas > <liber...@mykolab.com> wrote: > >> My OpenBSD node is currently on 0.2.5.10. > > Which is from the -current ports tree. On -stable it's > tor-0.2.4.23 but I doubt that you want to run your relay on > -current. > >> If compilation is considered tedious, though, I or someone like >> me could start more aggressively maintaining the Tor port. > > You're wrong because you're mistaking port and package > (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html). > >> I was actually considering this recently, although I have no >> prior experience with port development. > > Have you only even tried to mail the maintener? > > Quoting another mail from you for the lulz: > > On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:04:43 -0500, Libertas > <liber...@mykolab.com> wrote: > >> Another example that I forgot to mention earlier: encrypting swap >> on Debian or Ubuntu involves apt-getting and such. On OpenBSD, >> it involves changing two characters of /etc/sysctl.conf. > > You mean activating something which is activated by default since > 3.8 which has been released in Nov. 2005? > > Cheers, Vigdis _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUWsM2AAoJELxHvGCsI27NOJAQAKpv3d5BWNXTz9HQciF3QNua FPAttYiE2Wbhk5diHH2rI79ZyyoYFcMsbFJENKtnvhonNIFtPkzeZJRW37yBjYk8 elrI7PjjxBz8pGQ5agvSOlY/Sgfy9ZZFyikMyW0YyG2rMXfLmhWs/iBAfKPhEwgC +34pwKgxL3iMrNoaG6SwAQg1rypeLXbUoqpgl/Aw184OPhY4GLJNgJ8VyFlsILQs SAjR1Zc2hs29O5UCh2hM4Sl10CpGKYSq7AF1SqTQI1EpjwMgnna7fRvZAFhzlJeW tEJ8u3mIXtiEIaPNQq2ZfLy3roo+yIyTexEZHg+0VfzrXJKn8E4V1tTTRT3xp7c4 NapBikFHWN7N/QCEObyPlWOHlwTrBD9gsI7WmZKo9Am+zNyEJGMjW7+XzPnu20GN WBHGs/ryLAOctwSbRDyxWik/e++xkPkltGrsXrIvSPWHtXEw8AmV/ka/zkPx/V+M pwmi68jC+FlH237pScwGLopSe354TPNYxlaNyPHqbfySb9Q2KYwC2PkXEHafXKi+ nQNOJcjvZN8hpeGO8N/GRg/H0oCmOj0ubQrPCi7WrqpV3XIeTtqTqPMqCVudD0Gq USUn/JGfZxEJjFoZZtpErv/DqeveAZaVLUwjVUqzTb1FwWOBgFFO55X7+ez6zBAk KVTDqmnpGqsbRw05Fa/k =ubVg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays