Holy crap, 40%? And that's been historically acceptable?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Hahn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 20 Jan 2015, at 22:58, Roger Dingledine <[email protected]> wrote: >> We've already known about this in the context of "the bandwidth >> authority scripts are very poorly tuned for the changes that have >> happened in the Tor network since the scripts were written, so they >> vote wildly varying numbers for relays". But I don't think that >> we'd realized the "some relays don't get three votes at all, so they >> basically get zeroed out" issue. Hm. > > Yeah we knew about it actually, ot was discussed extensively but in > a different context. We knew that each dirauth misses up to 40% of > all relays in absolute amount, which means it misses an unknown > amount of bandwidth. Grr. > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
