> On 9 Nov 2015, at 20:31, Matthew Finkel <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:04:55PM +1100, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>> 
>>> On 9 Nov 2015, at 18:56, Matthew Finkel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Which version of Tor were you previously running? Have you seen these
>>> messages within the last few days, after you upgraded?
>>> 
>> 
>> Hi SiNA, Matthew,
>> 
>> I can reproduce some unusual behaviour from Faravahar simply using wget.
>> It seems that a web cache in front of Faravahar's dirport might be 
>> misbehaving.
> 
> For some reason I can't reproduce your results, but I agree that what you saw
> and what the various tor log snippets show does seem to point towards a kind
> of frontend caching proxy. This is unfortunate, but I don't see a way for
> the dirauth code to make a mistake like this, and we'd expect other authories
> would show the same symptoms if that was the case, as well.

I am happy to provide files exhibiting these issues if needed.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B

teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Reply via email to