Would Tor use a non-discretionary model of data transfer between the relays that would be a part of non-centralized network? Is there any real encryption in sense of information flow or only a conversion from discrete to non-discrete signal? Which circuitry algorithm would get used for so? Sorry, for asking all of these - I am just reading the history of anonymity. Thank you so much!
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It] > (Roger Dingledine) > 2. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It] > (Greg Moss) > 3. Re: [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It] > (JovianMallard) > 4. Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated It > (Peter Palfrader) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:21:38 -0400 > From: Roger Dingledine <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never > Initiated It] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:05:23PM -0400, Percy Blakeney wrote: > > In addition I DO NOT have the full Xfinity package. > > Hi folks, > > I'm going to put an end to this thread now. Please be aware that 1700+ > people are on the tor-relays list, so we really need to keep things > concise and on-topic. > > Thanks! > --Roger > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:25:32 -0700 > From: Greg Moss <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never > Initiated It] > Message-ID: > <CALA4K1TTE11B21p7Vb3+K=GBiomzJT5o_kk= > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Thanks Mr dingledine- was a good laugh but enough is enough > On May 31, 2016 4:21 PM, "Roger Dingledine" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:05:23PM -0400, Percy Blakeney wrote: > > In addition I DO NOT have the full Xfinity package. > > Hi folks, > > I'm going to put an end to this thread now. Please be aware that 1700+ > people are on the tor-relays list, so we really need to keep things > concise and on-topic. > > Thanks! > --Roger > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160531/d02494d3/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 18:45:32 -0400 > From: JovianMallard <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] [Fwd: Re: I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never > Initiated It] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Too much paranoia in this thread. Comcast's default wifi SSID is of the > format HOME-ABCD where ABCD are 4 hex chars, I'd guess the last 4 of the > MAC. > > If that's not this person's network, it's probably their neighbor's. > > > Minecraft is only available from minecraft.net and maybe the microsoft > store, not steam or origin. Someone else beat me to it, but it's trivial > to run on linux - install java, run .jar with java, sign in, don't see > sunlight for 18 months. > > > On 05/31/2016 06:10 PM, Gumby wrote: > > Minecraft is not very easy to install in Linux. > > - @Percy - so why would */Tor accept /**/192.168.0.0/16 > > <http://192.168.0.0/16>/*be in your torrc? you don't have that address, > > and I don't think the command is correct anyway.. anyone? > > > > Me > > > > On 05/31/2016 05:45 PM, Jim Electro House wrote: > >> > >> You said that your daughter installed Minecraft. Was it from a pirate > >> website or an online store(Steam, Origin, trusted website etc.)? > >> > >> On Jun 1, 2016 00:27, "Percy Blakeney" <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> I've recently taken her Dell out of her room and into mine. She > >> knows the rules and ALWAYS grabs me before installing or > >> attempting to install anything. The ONLY thing she successfully > >> installed was Minecraft. > >> > >> As of two days ago I ran several network scans using different > >> Android apps. I received the same result with each one: > >> > >> 10.0.0.1 Arris (router number ends with 23:04 which is correct) > >> 10.0.0.6 arrisxb3atom (router number ends with 22:FC which is > >> incorrect) > >> 10.0.0.45 android port 111 rpcbind portmapper > >> 10.0.0.61 inspirion port(s) 139 netbios-ssn smb directly over IP, > >> 445 microsoft-ds > >> > >> Also, it shows my two (2.4GHZ & 5GHZ) secured wifi names and one > >> xfinity network, as it should, however, it also shows HOME-E2DE > >> 2.4, HOME-E2DE 5 and another xfinity network. Though I don't even > >> bother contacting xfinity about this anymore, when I did in the > >> past I was always, ALWAYS, asked the same thing: "Unplug your > >> modem from your router." And each time I've had to tell them, I > >> don't have a separate modem, I have the Arris router/modem combo > >> that you gave me. > >> > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Gumby <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> Actually, looks like it used the 2.3.25 browser bundle. But it > >> was through emule file sharing. If he is legit, and I have > >> concerns, could the daughter download some old infected files > >> - and was it network aware enough to spread and infect a new > >> Mint/Ubuntu? > >> New variant back to life, finding any network, shared or not, > >> like the new ransomeware? > >> > >> Me > >> > >> On 05/31/2016 04:31 PM, Mirimir wrote: > >> > >> > >> So what versions did Mevade, Sefnit, etc use? > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> tor-relays mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> tor-relays mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> tor-relays mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> > >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> tor-relays mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tor-relays mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 819 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: < > http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160531/1d9e7e6a/attachment-0001.sig > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:36:16 +0000 > From: Peter Palfrader <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] I'm Running A Tor Exit But Never Initiated > It > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Mon, 30 May 2016, Christian Pietsch wrote: > > > Hi GDR! > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:54:41PM +0200, GDR! wrote: > > > On Sun, 29 May 2016 15:23:24 +0000 "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > I can't image a single reason why Tor should be configured to run a > > > > relay without the system admins knowledge. > > > > > > Debian did this - I'm not sure if it does that any more. > > > > This bug is not present in current and recent versions of Debian. > > Nor was it ever, ttbomk. > -- > | .''`. ** Debian ** > Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal > https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System > | `- https://www.debian.org/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > ------------------------------ > > End of tor-relays Digest, Vol 65, Issue 1 > ***************************************** > -- *A security is a process of maintaining an acceptable level of the risk.* *Milica Đekić* *Cybersecurity researcher* *Twitter: @MilicaDjekic9* *Cell: +381 63 1963627*
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
