On 09/01/2016 01:47 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On 8/31/16, Kenneth Freeman <kencf0...@riseup.net> wrote:
>> To me it seems to be a bit late in the day for a Cambrian >> Explosion -let a thousand anonymity networks bloom and see where it gets >> you. > > I wouldn't say that. So long as any particular network is > incapable or insufficient at resisting certain adversaries... > or any of its models on the people or other sides of things > are non ideal, or it just doesn't do what its users need it to > do, there's in fact every expectation that other networks > should and will bloom up. 1000? No of course not. Yet a > handful of similar nets based on some feature chart... sure. I was riffing a bit on Mao's infamous Hundred Flowers Campaign. "The policy of letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend is designed to promote the flourishing of the arts and the progress of science." Depends on your threat model, I suppose.
0xDD79757F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
