Couldn't they run a regular relay node instead? This would help them blend in their traffic so to speak while also not having to put themselves at risk of being cut off.
On 6 September 2016 04:47:41 BST, Dave Warren <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Sep 5, 2016, at 11:24, Kenneth Freeman wrote: >> >> >> On 09/04/2016 07:31 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> > On 09/04/2016 09:11 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: >> >> Do embassies and consulates run Tor nodes? AFAIK no studies have >been >> >> done on this, but diplomatic immunity and Tor would seem to be a >match >> >> made in Heaven. >> > >> > Well, they need uplinks, right? I doubt that diplomatic immunity >forces >> > ISPs to serve them. Private routing is possible, of course, but is >> > probably too expensive for most. >> >> Whatever their budgetary considerations, embassies and consulates >afford >> diplomatic safe spaces for Tor nodes. > >At best, they provide a *legal* safe space, but it would only take an >embassy having their local internet access terminated once or twice >before they'd re-consider, absent any agreements which block service >providers from doing such. I'd be surprise if such exist, although, >it's >certainly possible. > >Assuming we're talking exit nodes, anyway. > > > >_______________________________________________ >tor-relays mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
