Am 27.09.2016 um 19:37 schrieb nusenu: > [email protected] wrote: >> there is that list of "potentially_dangerous_relaygroups" you published. >> Could yo please emphasize a bit more on what brings a relay on that list, >> apart from incorrect given MyFamily which doesnt seem to be always the case. >> I mean I see quite a few well respected names on that list ? > > > to quote from https://github.com/ornetstats/stats > (1) "dangerous" in the sense that a tor client might has a chance to > use more than one of these relays in a single circuit > (2) these relays are aggregated based on contact information > (3) if their groupsize is bigger than their effective family size > and they are operated in more than one /16 network block they are listed > (4) this list might contain false-positives (contact information is > not authenticated) > > Does that answer your question? > > I probably should also filter entries where two out of guard_prob, > middle_prob and exit_prob are 0 since that means that (1) is never the > case - iff onionoo is right about these probabilities.
nusenu, great respect of your work at first and thank you for the answer provided as well. It - plus the follow up from that many contributors - did answer my questions apart from two left: - should only Markus be contacted instead of lets say at least all the folks with more than 2 notes to make them aware? - how could it take nearly a week for that serious discussion to start? I tend to agree with what has been written "I am in favour of a scheme where the process of joining a family is authenticated." Personally I will correct my entries soon to get me off that list :-) _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
