On 09/29/2016 04:29 PM, Cristian Consonni wrote: > You are correct in a sense. On the another hand in academia until a > work is published in a peer-reviewed conference or journal it does not > really count (you make like this or not, but this is another issue) > and/or it would be evident that it is a work in progress. > > Moritz mentioned a possible problem with the press misinterpreting the > results of this report: I would expect that a _bona fide_ journalist > that is able to find such a report on the website of a research would > also know that these are preliminary results. I would also expect such > a journalist to reach out to the authors for comments. If not, let's > say that against ignorance or malice you can not do much (even with a > completed work) and I would not blame the authors for the deficiencies > of others. > > That said, I do not see any other way to make this work reachable so > that the authors can talk about their preliminary results with as > many people as possible - and the "tor community" at large. The > alternative would be to select a closed group of people with whom to > share the report. > > Being a fan of "release early, release often" I prefer the current > alternative.
Totally agreed. Just for the record, Sadia reached out to me to ask before she posted here what they have so far. -- Moritz Bartl https://www.torservers.net/ _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
