> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 01:56, Rana <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK Tim thanks for the answers, I appreciate your patience with me > [even though I "lack programming skills" :) ] > > The one answer of yours that still does not make sense to me is that > arm actually means Kbytes/sec and not kbits/sec when it writes Kb/s > > I have arm reporting average of at least several tens of Kb/s all the time, > and about 100 Kb/s most of the time, and then I wind up with almost constant > 200 bit/sec actual average rate over 6 hours, based on the total number of > Mbytes sent that Tor reports in its log file. > > Even if the 200 bit/sec figure is somehow rounded to 8000 bit/ sec or > even 8000 bytes/sec as you suggested , this does not make sense…
Ok, so you didn't say that to start with, you seemed to be saying that it was constantly showing 100 kb/s. Perhaps arm is displaying your maximum bandwidth over a certain time? (I really don't now what bandwidth arm measures.) T -------------------------------- I do not have a slightest freaking idea and this arm thing seems to have been written by anarchists who thought that documentation was too bourgeois Rana _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
