> 
>> Isn’t it somehow dangerous in the area we operate, to rely on a piece
>> of software created more or less by a single person?
> 
> Thanks for this question. Can you give a few examples for "dangerous" in
> the context of your question so I might be able to address your concerns
> more specifically?

That is exactly the point, if you know the danger in advance, there might be a 
change you can address and possibly handle it.

In this case, somebody like me would rely on a piece of software that he 
possible cant judge, or totally understand and there are not several people who 
might have had an eye on it,checked it and agreed, that there is no 
misbehaviour? Who are trusted people in this group, who are not and why? Who is 
giving a service for what reason? I don’t want to go more down is road ending 
up in paranoia ....but I am sure some of those thoughts get shared.

Yes one argument might be, there is a long track record, reputation for a 
person - difficult for newcomers to judge.

I cant be more specific and please don’t take it personally - these are just 
general thoughts...and every single question (if and when it may arise) could 
be cleared..

Thank you and regards
Paul

Attachment: 0xC8C330E7.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Reply via email to