> On 14 Dec. 2016, at 06:01, Rana <[email protected]> wrote: > > After 9 days of running a relay with a stable IP address (with “Stable” flag > during the last 4 days) and consensus bw steadily oscillating around 20 > despite the 100 Kbyte/s bandwidth measured by Tor and 200 Kbyte/s bandwidth > measured on the Internet connection, I guess it is time to quit. My relay is > consistently sending less than 20MB every 6 hours, which probably means that > is not making a noticeable contribution to Tor network. > > I have also been running another relay for the last 5 days from a friend’s > home – he has a static IP, a different ISP from mine and twice the bandwidth. > His consensus is bw dead locked at 31 and never changes. He is getting Fast > flag on and off, no Stable flag, his Atlas measured bandwidth is 150 KB/s. > The traffic it relays is only slightly larger than mine, so I guess it is > time to quit for this one, too. > > Any other advice / ideas welcome.
I'm not sure if you've read this link that was provided earlier: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay "A new relay, assuming it is reliable and has plenty of bandwidth, goes through four phases: the unmeasured phase (days 0-3) where it gets roughly no use, the remote-measurement phase (days 3-8) where load starts to increase" The "assuming" should also specify: * low latency to North America / Western Europe, and * can handle thousands of simultaneous connections. Also, in my experience, the unmeasured and ramp-up phases are several times longer than specified in this post. > Am 13.12.2016 um 20:01 schrieb Rana: > >> You have been asked for fingerpring or atlas link several times. > > The nicknames of the two relays are ZG0 and GG2, respectively I'm going to repeat the advice I sent to the list a week ago: > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP > Date: 4 December 2016 at 20:03:21 AEDT > > But I don't know your relay's fingerprint, so I can only repeat the > general advice I have given others with similar questions: > > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-November/010913.html > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-November/010928.html > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-November/010916.html > > (There are more if you search the list archives.) > > That should be enough to get you started, if you'd still like specific > advice after reading those threads, feel free to let us know your > relay's fingerprint. And I'll update the advice I sent to you individually for those two fingerprints: > Date: 4 December 2016 at 21:21:19 AEDT > > The bandwidth authorities measured your relay as being able to handle > approximately (Neither of these measurements will be reliable until the relays have been up for a few weeks. You can look them up yourself at that time.) > (large pages) Latest: https://consensus-health.torproject.org/consensus-health.html > Your relay can be monitored using atlas at: ZG0: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/31B8C4C4F1C78F923BD906769297B15A428C4A04 GG2: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/707A9A3358E0D8653089AF32A097570A96400CC6 > Your relay's observed bandwidth is ZG0: 81.35 KByte/s GG2: 170.79 KByte/s > (hover over the > bandwidth heading in atlas for these details), so its consensus weight > will be limited to approximately ZG0: 81 GG2: 170 > Your bandwidth rate and burst are ZG0: 256 KByte/s and 358.4 KByte/s GG2: 153.6 KByte/s and 179.2 KByte/s Your relay is limited by: ZG0: its own ability to sustain more than 81.35 KByte/s over a 10 second period GG2: the bandwidth rate of 153.6 KByte/s In summary: ZG0: the relay itself reports that it is unable to sustain much tor traffic. GG2: it appears that the relay could handle more traffic, if you increased the bandwidth rate and bandwidth burst. I feel like I've given the same advice about ZG0 several times now, so I'm going to leave that with you to resolve however you want. T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
