Can confirm :( “Cheery was aware that Commander Vimes didn't like the phrase 'The innocent have nothing to fear', believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in the longer term even more from those who say things like 'The innocent have nothing to fear'.”
― Terry Pratchett, Snuff > On 21. Sep 2017, at 02:41, King Queen <[email protected]> wrote: > > See https://www.kimsufi.com/en/termsofservice/ "Special conditions for > Kimsufi Servers" > > "7.4 For security reasons, OVH reserves the right to proceed with the > immediate suspension without notice, of any server on which there is a > public service Proxy, IRC, VPN or TOR which is available free of > charge or for a fee, and for which OVH has knowledge of its fraudulent > or illegal misuse." > > Long experience is that the second they get any form of abuse > complaint they just terminate the server. > > D > > Wednesday, September 20, 2017, 12:06:18 AM, you wrote: > >> I should think they’d be fine, considering they “allow" scanning on their >> servers. >> If they were VPSs on the OVH range they’d care, but for a dedi as >> long as they’re not DoSing or getting insane amounts of abuse reports you’ll >> be fine. >> If you look at the ASN on atlas there are a few long-living Tor >> exit nodes running on Kimsufi/SoYouStart/OVH >>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 4:58 PM, King Queen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> For an exit node?! They will most definitely not be fine; they don't >>> allow them and they don't like any admin hassle at all as a result of >>> their ultra-cheap kimsufi dedis. The first whiff of an abuse complaint >>> and they'll nuke the server and probably the account. >>> >>> Monday, September 18, 2017, 10:06:24 PM, you wrote: >>> >>>> Tried Kimsufi? I believe that’ll be fine. >>> >>>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:27 PM, flipchan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> https://okservers.net/ doesn't provide vps :/ something like a good >>>> ISP that tolerate exit nodes would be good like something in holland maybe? >>> >>> >>>> On September 18, 2017 1:50:45 AM GMT+02:00, >>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>> Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to >>>> [email protected] >>> >>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>> [email protected] >>> >>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>> [email protected] >>> >>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>> than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..." >>> >>> >>>> Today's Topics: >>> >>>> 1. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (King Queen) >>>> 2. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (Alec Larsen) >>>> 3. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (nusenu) >>>> 4. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (nusenu) >>>> 5. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (George) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:59:12 +0100 >>>> From: King Queen <[email protected]> >>>> To: armenian_priest <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tolerant hosting for exit node. >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>> >>>> https://box.cock.li FTW >>> >>>> yeah it's servers with cocks, but it is in Romania / IP location the >>>> Seychelles, and I have had no issues with my exit node on them. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Sunday, September 17, 2017, 11:32:33 AM, you wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hello list, >>> >>> >>> >>>> I was hoping to get a good suggestion from here for a hosting provider >>>> that is tolerant with Tor exit nodes. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I went through the mailing list archive a few months back and there >>>> weren't any good suggestions on hosting providers. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Also, I checked the 'GoodBadISPs' page in the Tor wiki but it is pretty >>>> outdated and I already got burned with one provider from there: ITLDC, >>>> it was added on 2016-04-23 but they bluntly stated that they DO NOT >>>> tolerate exit nodes after 2 abuse complaints, my exit node was running >>>> for 1 month there. >>> >>> >>> >>>> One of the abuses was handled but with the second one they basically >>>> wanted me to block HTTP/S traffic on the VPS. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I am not sure who edits and keeps track of the mentioned page but it >>>> would be a good idea to remove the mentioned provider from there so >>>> other people wont waste their money. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hope to get some recommendations since I want to support the network >>>> with an exit node. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> >>> >>>> With regards, >>> >>> >>> >>>> jack >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> tor-relays mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> Take Care Sincerely flipchan layerprox >>>> dev_______________________________________________ >>>> tor-relays mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> King mailto:[email protected] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tor-relays mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > > -- > Best regards, > King mailto:[email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
