Thank you for the reply. I missed the post when searching the topic--the relays are a bit unusual and I keep tripping over them. . .
On Nov 29, 2017 01:37, "Chad MILLER" <chad at cornsilk.net> wrote: >To be honest, I reckon these UbuntuCore nodes are almost all mundane >desktops and server. > >I think there are only a few added each day, for a total of about one or >two thousand that intend to be bridges and relays. Intent doesn't mean they >have the inbound connectivity to join the consensus, though. > > > >On Nov 28, 2017 17:18, "Roger Dingledine" <arma at mit.edu> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 08:06:11PM -0500, starlight.2017q4 at binnacle.cx >> wrote: >> > The population of these has been climbing for more than a week and >> no-one has commented, which seems odd. No contact provided. >> > >> > https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/UbuntuCore >> >> See this thread: >> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-August/010046.html >> >> So they are not a single unified operator. >> >> What fraction of consensus weights are they? I'm under the impression >> they're running on refrigerators or whatever so most of them have crappy >> connectivity. >> >> --Roger >> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
