Op 04/12/2017 om 13:39 schreef teor: > > On 4 Dec 2017, at 22:18, Tom van der Woerdt <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Hi James, >> >> Have you considered running a super restrictive exit policy? I had the >> same trouble you have, with EFF's restrictive exit policy. So I wrote my >> own, which also blocks port 80: >> >> ExitPolicy accept *:443 >> ExitPolicy accept *:6667 > > A restricted exit policy is a good idea, but Exits must include port 80. > (If they don't, they will mainly be used as guard and middle relays.) > > Blocking port 80 isn't safe for users: it doubles the number of exits that > they must use, which doubles their risk of a malicious exit. > > So, when directory authorities update to 0.3.2, they will only vote Exit for > relays that allow both port 80 and 443. > > Background: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23637 > > T
Sorry to hear that :-( Guess I'll also have to stop running my exit, then. Tom _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
