On December 22, 2017 5:55:16 PM EST, "Fabian A. Santiago" <[email protected]> wrote: >On December 22, 2017 5:48:59 PM EST, teor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 23 Dec 2017, at 04:09, Fabian A. Santiago >><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> well, i intend to keep mine up indefinitely (barring the unforeseen) >>so why not? >>> >>> 2 relays: >>> >>> D122094E396DF8BA560843E7B983B0EA649B7DF9 >>> E911A899D51036A5D2A9DE0931A0A1E8DA4C6148 >> >>Hi, >> >>Fallbacks need a DirPort. >>Please let me know when you've configured one. >> >>For details, see: >>https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-December/013927.html >> >>T >> >>-- >>Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) >> >>teor2345 at gmail dot com >>PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B >>ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n >>xmpp: teor at torproject dot org >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Oh I did. But the startup log (journalctl) states since I call >AccountingMax in torrc, Tor wouldn't publish it. Didn't even consider >that. So deal breaker I suppose? Will it never publish it with that >parameter in place? These are new (less than 2 weeks) and I was >initially told by the list that it wouldn't get published right away >until Tor figures out that my Max value won't be surpassed. They're >both on port 80 in my torrc files. > >-- > >Thanks, > >Fabian S. > >OpenPGP: 3C3FA072ACCB7AC5DB0F723455502B0EEB9070FC >_______________________________________________ >tor-relays mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I just saw another reply of yours answering my question. Then please disregard my submittal. Sorry. -- Thanks, Fabian S. OpenPGP: 3C3FA072ACCB7AC5DB0F723455502B0EEB9070FC _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
