Yes, but are all guard and bridge relays configured like this? Maybe this should be a requirement for running a guard or bridge relay for this reason.
What does everyone think? From: Matthew Glennon Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 5:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Prepping bridges for censorship This is the reasoning I go with for using 443/80. On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:11 AM Martin Kepplinger <[email protected]> wrote: Am 21.06.2018 21:48 schrieb Keifer Bly: > Hi, > > So I had a thought. It seems like a lot of the relays run off of > various port numbers (of course). However if all of the relays and > bridges are running off of various port numbers (ie 9001, 10000, > etc.), couldn’t this stop censored users (who’s isp or local firewall > only allows certain ports like 80 and 443) from being able to connect > to the tor network even when using bridges due to the port that the > bridge of guard relay being run on a port number that is blocked by > the isp or local firewall? > > Just a thought. Sure, just like for guard relays, for bridges it makes sense to configure ORPort to be 443 or 80, to be reachable from behind messy firewalls. martin _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -- Matthew Glennon [email protected] PGP Signing Available Upon Request https://keybase.io/crazysane
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
