Hi, OVH also has some traffic limits, that get cut down to 10 Mbps (depending on the plan). So you could probably have a fast relay until the limit is reached and then keep doing 10 Mbps.
If the goal is to have better geographic diversity, I think a slower (or a bursting) relay might still be a good choice. Having relays do hundrets of Mbps is nice - but not the only way to have a useful relay. Best regards, Matthias On 09/16/2018 08:18 PM, niftybunny wrote: > DigitalOcean and Vultr have traffic limits. 1 TB sounds great, but is nothing > over a month. Not sure about OVH. > > I tried to run relays in Japan and Singapore some years ago. It was bad, you > are more than 10000 km away from the rest of the crowd so expect delay and > jitter :( > >> On 16. Sep 2018, at 19:16, Matthias Fetzer <t...@rofl.cat> wrote: >> >> Hello Olaf, >> >> OVH, DigitalOcean and Vultr have servers in Singapore. >> While this would probably add to geographic diversity, >> I am unsure if it's a good idea to run more relays >> in those AS. >> >> On the other hand, I run several OVH-Relays at different >> geographi locations. >> >> Best regards, >> Matthias >> >> On 09/16/2018 05:18 PM, Olaf Grimm wrote: >>> Roman, ignore this people. >>> >>> Do you have an intention for a relay in APAC? I looking for a provider >>> in Asia with unlimited bandwith / traffic. I've found nothing, >>> Or other recommendations? Maximum of 15$ is desired. >>> Or South America. or Africa. Outside of Tor-overloaded areas. >>> Want to reach my goal of 10 relays... >>> >>> Olaf >>> >>> >>> Am 16.09.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Roman Mamedov: >>>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 13:40:50 +0000 >>>> livak <li...@protonmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> it would be nice to find financial help to make the tor network grow >>>>> faster. >>>> You need to put things in perspective, and then consider how your request >>>> looks to an outside observer. What you have is a relay: >>>> >>>> - at OVH, which is oversaturated with relays by any measure; >>>> >>>> - only 10 Mbit (seems hard-capped), even though you get unmetered 100 Mbit >>>> on your server; >>>> >>>> - IPv4-only, while OVH does provide IPv6; >>>> >>>> To summarize, this is the worst location to start a new relay (some would >>>> say >>>> adding more relays at OVH does more harm than good), the bandwidth is >>>> capped >>>> ridiculously low, and you didn't even put much thought into setting it up. >>>> >>>> It seems that you think you found a way to set up a tiny relay on the side, >>>> exploit gullible people to pay you for it, and enjoy not only a paid-off >>>> server (after all the fee is as low as 4 EUR per month[1]) which you can >>>> use >>>> for your own purposes (with only 10% of the bandwidth given to Tor), but >>>> also >>>> some free money on top. >>>> >>>> Considering that many of us pay for multiple relays out of our own pocket >>>> -- >>>> actual fast ones with hundreds megabits at non-trivial locations -- and >>>> don't >>>> run the first thing to the mailing list begging for money, your behavior is >>>> nothing but disgusting. >>>> >>>> [1] https://www.kimsufi.com/fr/serveurs.xml >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tor-relays mailing list >>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
