I usually do it in torrc, but am experimenting with letting my ISP/host (Verizon FiOS and GTHost.com) traffic shaping do this on unmetered connections.
The reason for this is because I learned about bandwidth accounting as mentioned on an earlier post here: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2018-December/016780.html (https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2018-December/016780.html) Tor spends resources doing bandwidth accounting if you set RelayBandwidthRate and RelayBandwidthBurst. So the runoff is: torrc is convenient, but doing it externally can offload the shaping and free the Tor process to do other things (after all, Tor is still singlethreaded) but adds complexity to your OS/network setup. -Neel === https://www.neelc.org/ January 14, 2019 10:09 PM, "Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T." <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected]?to=%22Isaac%20Grover,%20Aileron%20I.T.%22%20<[email protected]>)> wrote: Good evening fellow relay operators, I haven’t ever taken the time to configure bandwidth limits in torrc, always preferring to manage it at the firewall as we have other bandwidth limits set there as well. However, I’m curious - what do other relay operators prefer? Make your day great, Isaac Grover, Senior I.T. Consultant Aileron I.T. – “ Because #ProactiveIsBetter ” O: 715-377-0440 (javascript:false), F:715-690-1029 (javascript:false), W: www.aileronit.com (http://www.aileronit.com/) LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/IsaacGrover/ (https://www.linkedin.com/in/IsaacGrover/) YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqrwZNFKdR-guKtuQzFPObQ (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqrwZNFKdR-guKtuQzFPObQ)
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
