Moin Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2019, 18:41 -0400 schrieb Steve Snyder: > I find it more alarming that a single exit operator handles 13% of > exit > traffic than that the DNS resolution is dominated by 2 big players. Hm.. There are two ways:
a) Others build up more exit capacity b) The one reduces it's capacity I, personally, prefer a).. I don't think b) is the way to go because the capacity is needed. Tim > > Although the DNS dependencies are bad too. > > > On 7/11/19 6:31 PM, nusenu wrote: > > > > > > https://medium.com/@nusenu/what-fraction-of-tors-dns-traffic-goes-t > > o-google-and-cloudflare-492229ccfd42 > > > > > > > 60.05% of the tor network’s exit capacity uses a resolver which > > > is > > > located in the same autonomous system as the exit relay itself > > > (that > > > includes localhost) which is recommended to minimize the path > > > between exit relay and its resolver. Lets aim to increase this > > > fraction to above 80%. > > > > > > If you are an exit operator and want to help reach this goal you > > > can > > > use this list to verify you are not using Google or Cloudflare > > > resolvers. > > > > https://gist.github.com/nusenu/e6eec32679cc64ffe3e24d2b9367a931 > > > > > The Tor Relay Guide has instructions for setting up a > > > local DNS resolver. > > > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorRelayGuide#DNSonEx > > itRelays > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tor-relays mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
