You're right, it went offline for around 2 days due to a power outage
and a Bios error that needed continue pressed.
That's what the stable flag is for, lol.
I lost guard probability for 2 more weeks.
If a relay has been up connected and stable for more than 2 weeks, it
gets the -stable- flag so it's leaned on more.
That doesn't really affect the underlying issue of tor nodes with TONS
of bandwidth not being utilized a little more.
But I'm happy to donate whatever the tor protocol decides it wants to
use :(
Matt Westfall
President & CIO
ECAN Solutions, Inc.
Everything Computers and Networks
804.592.1672
------ Original Message ------
From: "Vasilis" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 7/17/2019 9:00:00 PM
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unutilized bandwidth
Hi Matt,
First of all thank you for running relays.
Matt Westfall:
I kind of have the same problem, I have a gigabit relay setup too,
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/B1B10104EB72A1FBBF6687B05F1915D87D00DBDE
The consensus weight varies wildly and never seems to get very high.
I'm even running on 443 and 80
the replies I got before were basically is what it is and I mean we're still
helping the network by running a node,
Your relay got disconnected some times ago, you could see this on the 6-month
graph of your relay illustrated in the history section of relay search on Tor
metrics. Usually when a relay has been stable for some time it should be using
all available bandwidth, failure to do so may indicate that a server/network
problem.
Also Alec's relay (89094DFA4158C7A1583EC3A332CDCBC74A28CC0E9) advertised
bandwidth increased to 21.45 MiB/s (was 12 MiB/s 5 days ago).
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
~Vasilis
--
Fingerprint: 8FD5 CF5F 39FC 03EB B382 7470 5FBF 70B1 D126 0162
Pubkey: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5FBF70B1D1260162
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
