Hi William, > On 29. Jul 2020, at 00:45, Matt Traudt <[email protected]> wrote: > > The Guard flag conditions are > https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2640 > > Given you're Fast and Stable, and have a good advertised bandwidth and > weight, then I suspect you simply no longer have a Weighted Fractional > Uptime that is at least the median for "familiar" relays. > > Thus just give it time. > > This has nothing to do with volunteering to be a fallback directory mirror. > > Thanks for running a relay, and for doing so at an unpopular provider. > > On 7/28/20 9:29 AM, William Kane wrote: >> Please discard the previous (empty) email, it was an error on my end. >> >> Today, I noticed that my guard flag has been taken away: >> >> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/47E1157F7DA6DF80EC00D745D73ACD7B0A380BCF >> >> Does this have to do with the recent two, major downtime's of the relay? >> >> While I wasn't monitoring the server, the kernel decided (or rather >> oom-killer did) to reap the tor process for consuming too much memory >> (keep in mind, this is a virtual machine with only 1GB of RAM which >> running another daemon consuming about ~92MB's of RAM). >> >> I promptly restarted the relay, but the same thing happened again yesterday. >> >> So today, I manually set a lower MaxMemInQueues value instead of >> letting Tor calculate one for me - 640MB's instead of 732MB's. >> >> Still, I am confused as for why the guard flag has been taken away - I >> recently opted in to be a fallback directory mirror, does this have >> anything to do with it? >> >> The relay was stable and online for almost a year, so only 48 hours of >> downtime shouldn't affect the variables qualifying a relay to become >> and stay a guard that much? >> >> If this is because of the directory mirror thing, then please take my >> relay out of that pool - I want to stay a guard for a number of >> reasons - mainly because my host is only hosting about 10 tor relays >> unlike all the other big hosters that are commonly used - network >> variety is very important or so I've been taught, especially when it >> comes to guard relays. >> >> If this is a mistake on Tor Project's end, I please ask for it to be >> resolved - however, if it's the Directory Authorities disqualifying my >> relay, then there's nothing to be done except to wait. >> >> Greetings, >> William Kane
according to gabelmoo's vote, it requires: flag-thresholds stable-uptime=1202114 stable-mtbf=3679804 fast-speed=102000 guard-wfu=98.000% guard-tk=691200 guard-bw-inc-exits=18400000 guard-bw-exc-exits=14400000 enough-mtbf=1 ignoring-advertised-bws=1 gabelmoo assigns your relay the following values: R 47E1157F7DA6DF80EC00D745D73ACD7B0A380BCF +MTBF 4632038 0.93987 S=2020-07-27 21:47:42 +WFU 4632038 4728633 As you can see, you barely do not make the WFU (required: 98%, you have 97.95%). Note that more recent downtimes are given more weight (that's what the W stands for in WFU). Very soon your flag should be back. Cheers Sebastian _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
